Amy Coney Barrett: “I would have no interest in as a court of appeals judge, challenging that precedent.”

Even if a law does clearly and undeniably discriminate on the basis of transgender status, then it still wouldn’t trigger heightened scrutiny.

Is it your contention that every country needed to be tariffed because of threats to the defense and industrial base?

Legislatures have many valid reasons to make policy in these areas, and so long as a statute is a rational means of pursuing a legitimate end, the Equal Protection Clause is satisfied.

I think the Constitution is alive and well.