Jessica Rosenworcel

Yes, I think the FCC has a role in protecting consumers from cybersecurity threats.

I think those are serious issues of character qualification under Title III of our statute.

Is Chairman Pai's FCC advancing the public interest of the United States of America?

I do not believe we have been cooperating with law enforcement agencies. I think that is a problem.

I alone expressed concern about how the agency had bent and twisted so many of its media policies to serve the business plans of this one company.

Yes, we are going to need smaller license sizes if we want wireless providers to serve rural America with this band.

Too often during the last 9 months, the agency acted at the behest of corporate forces that surround it, shortchanging the American people.

I believe the future belongs to the connected. No matter who you are or where you live in this country, you need access to modern communications to have a fair shot at 21st century success.

I am concerned about the proposed changes to the Lifeline Program. I am worried that, if adopted, it will only further widen the digital divide and be a major setback for vulnerable populations like veterans.

I don't believe it clearly gives us that authority, no.

Yes, for items that are placed on our monthly agenda meeting.

There are 1.3 million veterans in this country that rely on the Lifeline Program today.

No, I don't agree with that assertion.

The majority has done this harm not only by revoking high-profile policies like net neutrality...

Jessica Rosenworcel has called for hearings and a report to the Commission to determine what further relief is needed.

we believe this slice of spectrum provides the best near-term opportunity for promoting innovation and expanding current offerings, such as Wi-Fi. That's because combining the airwaves in this band with those already available for…

The Warning Alert and Response Network Act makes it voluntary.

I do think we need to develop a record when these happen because if we identify patterns of behavior that are causing them to happen, we can take steps to make sure they do not happen again.

I just think we need a level of coordination in order to ensure that people stay safe and they get the information they need.

The FCC should prevent this from happening by serving as a convening force to develop a checklist of best practices.

I think what we're starting to recognize is that ballistic missile attacks are a completely different category in the panic that ensues and also in the damage that could occur, and we might need to treat those differently.

The public needs confidence in the systems that warn us when the unthinkable occurs.

Whether or not we have the authority, I think we have the responsibility to explore what these alerts should look like in the future.

It is essential for something like a ballistic missile attack that we coordinate. Anything less is unacceptable.

So to change that would require a change in law.