Let us get right down to brass tacks. We are about to break for a spring break. Agencies are about to have to start laying people off through some Neanderthal way that will not give them good control and good management control unless we pass this bill. We are like the board of directors for the entire Federal Government, and unfortunately, we have gotten too much in the habit of playing little games, kicking those people like you kick a soccer ball, and if we do not get this bill out of here we will be doing that one more time. Everybody has testified that the buyouts are the way to go. This way we can target who we want and we do not have to go through RIF's which are last hired, first fired, or do not have to go through freezes or any of the other things that do not give control. This gives control. It was good enough for DOD, it was good enough for the CIA, and it has been good enough for the private sector. It has been shown to do exactly the same thing, only surgically and well done.
Patricia Schroeder: “Let us get right down to brass tacks. We are about to break for a spring break. Agencies are about to have to start…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for a bill to manage federal layoffs effectively.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
last June I asked the Secretary of Defense to answer a few questions about growing numbers of military personnel on loan to Members of Congress under questionable circumstances. To date, I have not received a reply. Now I know why. They…
I was really pleased to hear the Speaker say he did not have an objection to it, and was wondering, since it appears to have been cleared and so noncontroversial, could we get it out and could we get it passed?
Today free speech has been frozen on the House floor. I never thought I could live to see that day. We have now had a ruling today that newspapers can discuss these issues, editorial boards can discuss these issues, but the Members of this…
But that ``it'' cost a half a million dollars and we cannot see it. This morning's Washington Post has a clarification of what the Speaker said about the ``it'' in it. And I hope that everybody reads it, because while the Speaker said one…





