But that ``it'' cost a half a million dollars and we cannot see it. This morning's Washington Post has a clarification of what the Speaker said about the ``it'' in it. And I hope that everybody reads it, because while the Speaker said one thing on NBC, this morning's Washington Post clarifies that and sets out the different complaints that have been filed and what has happened to them. I think it is very sad we cannot talk about ``it'' on the floor. Especially since the taxpayers paid for ``it.'' And if I were a taxpayer, I think I would be angry and wondering what in the world is going on when the House Floor has been gagged from talking about the most important thing we could have in front of us.
Patricia Schroeder: “But that ``it'' cost a half a million dollars and we cannot see it. This morning's Washington Post has a clarification…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing restrictions on discussing a significant issue in the House related to taxpayer money.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I was really pleased to hear the Speaker say he did not have an objection to it, and was wondering, since it appears to have been cleared and so noncontroversial, could we get it out and could we get it passed?
I was concerned about the words ``shameless demagoguery.'' I think those are words we could have taken down, and I do not really want to do that. But I think that is a very strong word.
I find that fairly astonishing, that they tell us we can go outside and talk about it, but we cannot talk about it on the floor.
You show me an American woman who tells you that rape is not a serious bodily injury, I want to see that person come forward. I think it is shocking that we would have males sitting on the court of appeals that would say that…





