If you are going to have to build a road along a ridge, when less than half a mile away was a route that would save the taxpayers an enormous amount of money, then I would prefer desirable, rather than necessary. The counter offer was, yes, you can have desirable but you have to add their language ``and such road by located so as to have the minimum practical impact on wilderness values.'' Now they gave me desirable, but it has to have minimal impact. It is entirely possible the ridge route, which was the unacceptable route, may be the one with the desirable impact. On the one hand they give you 15 years, and on the other they take it away with new language that had to be put in there. The dance continued. I said why is it you cannot understand that all I wanted is the opportunity to save taxpayers money in building a road in an area less than 1 square mile? My original amendment was to simply delete the 1 square mile. The deletion of even 1 square mile produced this ongoing marathon language dance to try to indicate that they would hold in front of me a promise that I could not tell people honestly that I could deliver. Deleting the 1 square mile was certainly way to do it. We have now come to the point where in the negotiations, the language is desirable. Not necessary, but desirable. Desirable so that the taxpayers could save money.…
Editor's note · Context
Discussing road construction and cost-saving measures during legislative negotiations.
Share
More from William M. Thomas
that is the dialog we have had all along. The fact is they wrote the bill, it was in it and they were not going to let it come out all along no matter what. It was the question of losing 1 square mile, not necessarily where it was, it was…
that ringing you hear in your ears is the Democratic spin doctors; we just heard another one trying to tell you that, when the President's plan was offered in the Subcommittee on Health yesterday, it was done just to embarrass the…
If she is going to answer the question, she needs to respond to the question that was asked, not how they are going to pay it. What happens if they don't pay it. The question is what happens if they don't pay it.
Mr. Speaker, H. Res. 329 designates 1994 as a year to remember Thomas P. Tip O'Neill, Speaker of the House of Representatives. I think it also, appropriately, should honor his talents. His training, of course, came from the ward politics…





