I, too, am pleased to take the time to remind all Americans that the Armenian genocide was the first genocide of the twentieth century. I think it is ironic that, as we are speaking now in memory of the first genocide of the twentieth century, that perhaps we are experiencing one of the last. Or yet will there be other genocides? When will the lesson be learned? Those of us who are from California, especially central California, have a number of friends who are Armenian. My chief of staff is Armenian. I have listened to their personal stories and the tragedies that they have lived through. It seems entirely appropriate that we carry these people in our memories as those who, at the very beginning of the 20th Century, experienced the worst of all possible debacles. That is, not murder, not mass murder, but genocide, and that with the Armenians' ability to cope and relate, let us hope that we, after this year, remember only the history of genocides and not the continuing ones.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the Armenian genocide during a speech in the House.
Share
More from William M. Thomas
The national health board, dictatorial, stopping all of the change that has been made in the States, controlling the prices, is it really the best choice for the American health system?
I thought he said he wanted to make sure the rules were honored, and here clearly he violates the rules that he wants to use to stop us. That is an example of the kind of duplicity that goes on around here. You cannot have it both ways…
perhaps the chairman of the subcommittee was not on the floor when I indicated to him that this was something that came up when we got to maps that more precisely allowed us to more fully understand where the area was. I wrote a letter to…
If she is going to answer the question, she needs to respond to the question that was asked, not how they are going to pay it. What happens if they don't pay it. The question is what happens if they don't pay it.





