Mr. Chairman, this is a repeat debate over an old issue. I certainly have not changed my position, but I do not think we ought to make it easier to implement a law that is very clearly wrong. The law established in 1977 by Coker against Georgia by the Supreme Court was very explicit. That case was a terrible rape case, a brutal rape case, but the woman was not killed. The Supreme Court ruled, and I believe it was 7 to 2, that the death penalty was disproportionate, and therefore unconstitutional under cruel and unusual punishment, because for the Government to execute someone in connection with another crime, somebody should have been killed, somebody should have been murdered. Even in this brutal rape case, the Supreme Court said that it was inappropriate and unconstitutional, cruel and unusual, to have the death penalty. Mr. Chairman, the subcommittee that I chair just in the last few weeks received a report on the implementation of the drug kingpin law that was put into effect a number of years ago. We found that, out of 37, I believe, Federal drug kingpin capital cases, the death penalty was administered disproportionately against minorities.
William Edwards: “Mr. Chairman, this is a repeat debate over an old issue. I certainly have not changed my position, but I do not think we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the death penalty and its disproportionate application in drug kingpin cases.
Share
More from William Edwards
Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment offered by the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Johnson] and the gentleman from Tennessee [Mr. Duncan]. Back in 1963 when the Supreme Court outlawed compulsory religious services, that is what…
Mr. Chairman, I think we ought to make it very clear that all of the evidence is that there is no deterrence in death penalties. I do not know how many of you saw McNeil-Lehrer 3 nights ago where a triple murderer was asked over and over…
I have examined this and members of my subcommittee have examined the amendment offered by the gentleman from California [Mr. Rohrabacher], and it just invites racial discrimination. It is almost frightening what would happen to the…
The Racial Justice Act in this bill which would be stricken and which I oppose is also opposed by the National Association of Attorneys General. I happen to have a letter signed by 32 of them individually. They strongly oppose the…





