The Racial Justice Act in this bill which would be stricken and which I oppose is also opposed by the National Association of Attorneys General. I happen to have a letter signed by 32 of them individually. They strongly oppose the underlying Racial Justice Act. It is opposed by the National District Attorneys Association, the National Troopers Coalition, and the American Legislative Exchange Council, which is the largest body representing State legislators in this country. The reason why they oppose the underlying Racial Justice Act is very simple. They perceive, as I do, that it would effectively eliminate the death penalty in many, if not all, death penalty cases. It creates an inference of racial discrimination on the basis of death penalty statistics.
William Edwards: “The Racial Justice Act in this bill which would be stricken and which I oppose is also opposed by the National…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the Racial Justice Act and its implications for the death penalty.
Share
More from William Edwards
Mr. Chairman, this is a repeat debate over an old issue. I certainly have not changed my position, but I do not think we ought to make it easier to implement a law that is very clearly wrong. The law established in 1977 by Coker against…
Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment offered by the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Johnson] and the gentleman from Tennessee [Mr. Duncan]. Back in 1963 when the Supreme Court outlawed compulsory religious services, that is what…
Mr. Speaker, it occurred to me, listening to this very interesting debate, that we are making a national and international hero out of this scoundrel who has uttered these disgraceful, awful things. He will be the only person in world…
Mr. Chairman, I think we ought to make it very clear that all of the evidence is that there is no deterrence in death penalties. I do not know how many of you saw McNeil-Lehrer 3 nights ago where a triple murderer was asked over and over…





