The Racial Justice Act in this bill which would be stricken and which I oppose is also opposed by the National Association of Attorneys General. I happen to have a letter signed by 32 of them individually. They strongly oppose the underlying Racial Justice Act. It is opposed by the National District Attorneys Association, the National Troopers Coalition, and the American Legislative Exchange Council, which is the largest body representing State legislators in this country. The reason why they oppose the underlying Racial Justice Act is very simple. They perceive, as I do, that it would effectively eliminate the death penalty in many, if not all, death penalty cases. It creates an inference of racial discrimination on the basis of death penalty statistics.
Editor's note · Context
Debating the Racial Justice Act and its implications for the death penalty.
Share
More from William Edwards
Mr. Speaker, it occurred to me, listening to this very interesting debate, that we are making a national and international hero out of this scoundrel who has uttered these disgraceful, awful things. He will be the only person in world…
This is real streamlining. It takes care of these endless delays. It provides for counsel. It is a real reform. The gentleman from Illinois offers us nothing but more of the same delays, delay, delay.
Mr. Chairman, I listened with great interest to the gentleman from Wisconsin and my good friend, the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Hyde] and they have been complaining for months and even years that the habeas system is not working, that…
Mr. Chairman, this is a repeat debate over an old issue. I certainly have not changed my position, but I do not think we ought to make it easier to implement a law that is very clearly wrong. The law established in 1977 by Coker against…





