I was heartened by the remarks of the chairman of the subcommittee, the gentleman from Michigan, when he said that we are all trying to struggle to find language that is acceptable to put off those confrontations that inherently occurred because of language inserted in the act. Most of us did not know that language was going into the act, and the author of the language said he had no intention of doing what most people out in the real world felt we were doing, and that is intruding on home schools and private education. Let us look at the Armey language. Let us not debate the notion of whether the Federal Government belongs in the school business; let us look at the language: Nothing in this Act shall be construed to permit, allow, encourage or authorize any Federal control over any aspect of private, religious, or home school. This is a restatement of current law. That is section 432.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses concerns about federal control over home schools and private education in proposed legislation.
Share
More from William C. Baker
I want to talk today about a little girl 13 years old in Laguna Beach named Lauren. Lauren's grandmother, Jean Meredith, is one of my dearest friends. About a month ago they discovered, as they were looking for a genetic defect in little…
I was not present for the vote on the final passage of H.R. 811, the reauthorization of the independent counsel, because I was unaware that this was a 5-minute vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``no.'' Although I strongly support…
Opponents of the balanced budget, including the old Democrat, President Clinton, claim it is a gimmick, that Congress already has the power to balance the budget. However, Congress has demonstrated it is incapable of balancing a Federal…
as we consider the President's health care reform plan, we must not forget small business and what harm this plan will do to them. The President's plan calls for a mandatory 7.9-percent payroll tax. This additional tax on hiring will…





