it is projected that the Federal Government will take in more than $2 trillion in taxpayer overpayments over the next decade, excluding Social Security dollars. Should we not use a small part of this surplus to correct one of the most onerous provisions of the U.S. Tax Code, the totally unfair marriage penalty? The bill we are considering today will provide real tax relief for 25 million married couples, 47,000 of which are in my district in northern California. This legislation will save taxpayers almost $90 billion over the next 5 years. It is important to remember that these are dollars that married taxpayers currently pay to the government for no other reason except that they are married. The Clinton-Gore administration claims that we cannot afford to give back to the taxpayers a small portion of their tax overpayment. Mr. Speaker, if we cannot afford to give the taxpayers back some of their own money when we have record budget surpluses, when will we be able to? When a couple stands at an altar and says, ``I do,'' they are not agreeing to higher taxes. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bill, and I hope that the President and the Vice President, Al Gore, would drop their opposition and sign this much-needed measure into law.
WALLY HERGER: “it is projected that the Federal Government will take in more than $2 trillion in taxpayer overpayments over the next…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing tax relief for married couples and addressing the marriage penalty in the U.S. Tax Code.
Share
More from WALLY HERGER
While I believe that market approaches hold great promise for improving the situation, my intent is to use the information we learn from this hearing as a starting point for further assessment of the consolidation issue.
These cuts will significantly alter the program and jeopardize seniors' access to the health plans they rely on.
Understanding the successful structure of the current MA program, and the challenges the program will face because of the Democrats' health law, is key to ensuring Medicare meets the needs of seniors now and into the future.
The law's new mandates and regulations are standing in the way of job creation at a time when unemployment remains high and our economy desperately needs more jobs.





