I rise today to affirm my support for product liability reform and commonsense legal reforms, but it is with great regret that I am not able to vote for final passage of this measure. First, let me be clear that I strongly believe that we need to replace the current costly patchwork of State laws on product liability with a uniform standard which is fair to consumers, manufacturers, and small businesses. Although over 70 percent of products routinely travel across State lines, under our current laws, the outcome of product liability lawsuits more often depend on geography than the merits of the cases. this confusion of 50 separate State laws stifles business innovation and development. As a result of skyrocketing liability costs, 39 percent of American manufacturers have decided not to introduce new products and 25 percent have discontinued new product research. For consumers, disparate liability laws means that the costs for litigation and skyrocketing insurance rates are passed on to them through higher prices for products. Furthermore, I support restoring fairness to liability litigation by applying a fair share principle for determining noneconomic damage awards, a step that the majority of States have already taken. This provision would ensure that victims are fairly compensated, but put an end to the practice of lawyers suing any deep pocket who is even remotely connected to the case.
Victor Fazio: “I rise today to affirm my support for product liability reform and commonsense legal reforms, but it is with great…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing product liability reform and its impact on consumers and manufacturers.
Share
More from Victor Fazio
I did not serve here during the Watergate era. But in the 20 years I have been here, I have been greatly involved in ethics issues, serving on the Committee on Ethics for 8 years and leading on perhaps the most important bill of my career…
I think it makes a bad proposal less bad, but I understand that the gentleman has the votes on his side, so I certainly will not oppose it. In fact, I encourage him to offer it. But I do think that when we begin to think about those things…
The so-called Berkeley radical who became a Statesman, Ron Dellums, deserves the time he has had on the floor and far many more hours that may be accorded before too long. But we are going to miss him, and we are going to miss him largely…
as we have already adopted the Cox amendment that clarifies the law, this amendment is entirely superfluous and offered only for political purposes. And it strikes me as highly hypocritical for any Member of this body who has been engaged…





