as we have already adopted the Cox amendment that clarifies the law, this amendment is entirely superfluous and offered only for political purposes. And it strikes me as highly hypocritical for any Member of this body who has been engaged in raising soft or hard money in the system we currently have in place to stand before his colleagues and a national audience and criticize the Vice President because he did something that has clearly under the law never been prosecuted. The Pendleton Act, over 100 years old now, has never ever been used to prosecute anyone for the solicitation of funds from an office. I think we now have a clear understanding of what is appropriate. But we could find the names of at least 3 sitting Republican senators who have admitted raising funds in their offices on the telephone. This is not a partisan issue. We are moving in the direction of reform. And for the gentleman from Texas (Mr. DeLay) to bring this amendment now is simply to try to imply that there is only one party or perhaps one individual that must alter behavior. We have all must do that. This administration, including the Vice President, has been out front in advocating campaign finance reform, the Shays-Meehan bill the centerpiece of that effort.
Victor Fazio: “as we have already adopted the Cox amendment that clarifies the law, this amendment is entirely superfluous and offered…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing campaign finance reform and criticizing a proposed amendment during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Victor Fazio
the right to religious freedom should be a fundamental right that every citizen enjoys. Indeed, our nation was founded on this premise. Yet sadly, there are nations where being a Muslim, a Jew, a Christian, or any of a number of other…
I think the bipartisan agreement on this amendment, which has been made between both sides, is an important step toward improving an already excellent bill. I only wish that many of the people on the majority side of this aisle had taken…
it is my understanding that crop insurance was not part of the legislation when it passed these individual Houses and was added simply on the same basis that the food stamp provision was. There is some inconsistency.
I rise today in support of Shays-Meehan. The bipartisan bill will: Eliminate soft money contributions to political parties from individuals and organizations: Require disclosure of contributions for issue ads that target specific…





