when is a compromise not a compromise? Well, this conference report is a classic example of one. The language in this report, negotiated behind closed doors, does not move an inch in the right direction toward what the Department of Defense's interests are, what is best for the American military forces, and what is best for the taxpayers' dollar. That is competition to determine the best place to overhaul and repair military workload. This conference report moves in the wrong direction. This so-called compromise language, written without the knowledge or input of several members of the authorizing committee itself, restricts competition. Instead of creating a level playing field, it tilts it even further in favor of public depots, which may not be as cost-effective as the private sector in all cases. But rather than let competition determine the winner, this report, I think, skews the outcome in favor of one type of competitor without concern for the impact on the taxpayer. If that is not enough, there is a new wrinkle in this report that ought to raise the eyebrows of some other Members. That is the restriction on supercomputer exports, which will have a chilling effect on our Nation's high-tech industry, threatening America's status as the world's leading exporter of technology. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to oppose this conference report because it is 'veto bait.' I emphasize that.…
Victor Fazio: “when is a compromise not a compromise? Well, this conference report is a classic example of one. The language in this…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a conference report related to military workload and supercomputer export restrictions.
Share
More from Victor Fazio
when I came to Congress 20 years ago I had hundreds of sugar beet growers in the Sacramento Valley. Today we have far fewer. Acreage is down. We have lost a number of refineries. They are closing because there is not enough product grown…
I have been reading the gentleman's amendment, and I think that I can come up with a number of phrases that would apparently be permitted but which, under his amendment, would be very questionable. Think of words like ``Think Joe Smith''…
Reclaiming my time, then, what the gentleman is saying is that the approach that has been the time-honored bipartisan approach which has given both Republican and Democratic, Presidents the opportunity and flexibility to include various…
as we have already adopted the Cox amendment that clarifies the law, this amendment is entirely superfluous and offered only for political purposes. And it strikes me as highly hypocritical for any Member of this body who has been engaged…





