I am very disappointed at this point. I voted for the budget resolution, and I looked forward to the bipartisan cooperation we saw then put in place so we could vote today to send this bill to conference in the same bipartisan manner. But the bill comes up short. We do not need a provision to take the Hyde language on abortion and make it permanent law. We need to pay more attention, for example, to the way in which we try to extend health care to the 10 million kids in our society that are not covered by insurance today. First of all, we need an outreach program, because we know there are 3 million of them that are currently eligible for Medicaid who are not part of it. We need to expand the Medicaid program to try to broaden coverage throughout our States. On top of that, we need insurance reforms that will make it possible for parents to buy insurance for their children if the children do not get it where they work, or if the children are not covered. Most of all, we need to work with the States to go after the kids of the working-poor families who are not covered, but simply, to make a grant to the States and tell them they can use it for almost any purpose is going to do nothing more than supplant existing State funds. We need to expand affordable insurance coverage and not simply go through a shell game with State and Federal dollars. There are ways we can make this a better bill. I hope I can support it when it comes back from conference.
Victor Fazio: “I am very disappointed at this point. I voted for the budget resolution, and I looked forward to the bipartisan…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about a budget bill and the need for better health care coverage for uninsured children.
Share
More from Victor Fazio
I rise in support of it, and want to express my deep thanks for the way in which the people I represent in agriculture in California have been treated in this bill and in prior bills. I have enjoyed greatly my opportunity to serve on this…
the New York Times calls it budget bologna. The Washington Post dubs it budget theatrics. Even the Senate Budget Chairman Pete Domenici, our longtime Republican leader there, calls it a mockery. But no matter what it is labeled, the budget…
as we have already adopted the Cox amendment that clarifies the law, this amendment is entirely superfluous and offered only for political purposes. And it strikes me as highly hypocritical for any Member of this body who has been engaged…
As we look to the next Congress, the one that will fix the Social Security system for the out years, the baby boomers, we need to maintain every dime we can so that we do not end up forcing people to work longer or live longer to benefit…





