I think everyone here, Mr. Leader, would like to proceed on the agenda to complete this Congress, and certainly I think most of us would have hoped we could have taken up the Amtrak matter yesterday, as we had scheduled to. But it seems to me the one key component to getting agreement from both sides of the aisle to proceed on all these important matters is an overridingly important issue that relates to the gentlewoman from Orange County, CA [Ms. Sanchez]. She will be having an anniversary, as we all will, of our election here before we leave this town the first Tuesday of November, and yet she has not been accorded the same ability to take and hold her seat that the rest of us have. I think it is fair to say the people on this side of the aisle, who showed the power of their support for her last night, retain that interest, and implore the majority to bring that issue to close before we leave. If that assurance can be given, I think the process here can be eased greatly.
Victor Fazio: “I think everyone here, Mr. Leader, would like to proceed on the agenda to complete this Congress, and certainly I think…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for a resolution regarding Ms. Sanchez's ability to hold her seat before Congress adjourns.
Share
More from Victor Fazio
I have been reading the gentleman's amendment, and I think that I can come up with a number of phrases that would apparently be permitted but which, under his amendment, would be very questionable. Think of words like ``Think Joe Smith''…
sometimes these bills are known for what they do and sometimes for what they do not do. I think that most of us today are pleased that we are beginning to attend to the problems created by the disasters that have befallen this country over…
I rise in support of it, and want to express my deep thanks for the way in which the people I represent in agriculture in California have been treated in this bill and in prior bills. I have enjoyed greatly my opportunity to serve on this…
as we have already adopted the Cox amendment that clarifies the law, this amendment is entirely superfluous and offered only for political purposes. And it strikes me as highly hypocritical for any Member of this body who has been engaged…





