the Exon amendment would cut $4 billion. That is no little amount of money. That is a lot of money--a $4 billion cut out of our defense. The military chiefs say we need to modernize. We especially need to do more procurement, more ships, more planes, modern weapons, and tanks. How can we do it if you are going to go and cut defense now below what is recommended? We cannot afford this. I would ask that this amendment be voted against, and at this time I will now yield to the ranking member.
Tony Thurmond: “the Exon amendment would cut $4 billion. That is no little amount of money. That is a lot of money--a $4 billion cut out…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Exon amendment that proposed significant cuts to defense spending.
Share
More from Tony Thurmond
60 years ago I was serving as a Circuit Judge for the State of South Carolina. It was an early Sunday afternoon when news reports began to stream in about the attack against the United States that took place at Pearl Harbor, HI. As I…
today, I am again introducing legislation that would correct the long-standing injustice to the widows or widowers of our military retirees. The proposed legislation would immediately increase for surviving spouses over the age 62 the…
The Senator is correct, the status quo simply does not make fiscal sense. It is my understanding that the cost of the two plants together is less than the cost of current storage requirements, over a comparable time period. In fact…
one does not need to look much further than their mailbox and the bills they receive for filling the gas tank or heating the house to realize that the United States is in need of direction and leadership when it comes to an energy policy…





