Tony Thurmond: “I rise to oppose the Grassley amendment, which would reduce defense spending from the $265.6 billion of the proposed…”

“I rise to oppose the Grassley amendment, which would reduce defense spending from the $265.6 billion of the proposed budget resolution to $257.3 billion. I understand that the amendment would, however, make additional funds available to the President if he certifies a requirement for such additional funds. This is an unprecedented approach and an unnecessary and inappropriate transfer of power and authority from the legislative branch to the executive branch. Let me be clear, Mr. President. The amendment of the Senator from Iowa is really a nullification of 75 percent of the Budget Committee's recommended increase to the President's budget request. Why would the President, who has already submitted his budget request, certify to the Congress that he needs additional funds for quality of life, modernization or readiness programs? Further, if he did request additional funds, those funds would likely be for programs that have not been directed by the Congress. We must all remember that the Constitution gives the Congress, not the President, the power to 'raise and support armies,' and 'to provide and maintain a navy.'”