What we will be doing by passing this amendment would be opening the door for frivolous lawsuits in a particular type of case. Ironically, there would even be new issues to litigate. Now we could litigate the question of whether a derivative product was involved or not, whether it was peripheral to the transaction, whether it was central to the transaction, whether it was really derivative or not. All of this is rather abstruse and in any case irrelevant to what we are trying to do right here.
TJ Cox: “What we will be doing by passing this amendment would be opening the door for frivolous lawsuits in a particular type of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to lawsuits.
Share
More from TJ Cox
It is unacceptable that, even today, 2 years after the worst drought in California's history, there are families in my district that cannot drink the water out of their taps.
The concerns about sovereignty by the People's Republic of China ought not to take precedence over public health, certainly not over the health of children in Taiwan. Taiwan's access to the resources of the World Health Organization is a…
we are gathered here to deal with a problem that none of us wants and we are agreed upon much more than we admit. The censure resolution, not the articles of impeachment, but the censure resolution states that William Jefferson Clinton has…
This bill uses a carrot and stick approach to both invest in this essential transit system as well hold the system accountable to providing safer, more reliable service.





