What we will be doing by passing this amendment would be opening the door for frivolous lawsuits in a particular type of case. Ironically, there would even be new issues to litigate. Now we could litigate the question of whether a derivative product was involved or not, whether it was peripheral to the transaction, whether it was central to the transaction, whether it was really derivative or not. All of this is rather abstruse and in any case irrelevant to what we are trying to do right here.
TJ Cox: “What we will be doing by passing this amendment would be opening the door for frivolous lawsuits in a particular type of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to lawsuits.
Share
More from TJ Cox
It is unacceptable that, even today, 2 years after the worst drought in California's history, there are families in my district that cannot drink the water out of their taps.
If I tried to tell company investors or shareholders that I was going to reorganize a company without showing them evidence of a need to do so or a way to measure success, a plan, I would be laughed out of the room.
That is, again, the correct interpretation. As the gentleman and I have discussed privately, this is a very important power that the Select Committee will possess. It should be used sparingly, not only after a vote, but after consultation…
I am here, today, to urge the subcommittee to include sufficient funding to maintain and upgrade California's water storage and conveyance systems.





