I would just point out, we just saw an exhibit on the floor and, as is so often the case when one reads the headlines, you miss the story. In the fine print the gentleman from Michigan forgot to tell us the last sentence of that happens to be a concise statement of the purpose of the bill. It says, ``The purpose of the bill,'' and this was actually on what he presented to us, but you could not read it, only the headline, ``The purpose of this bill remains to reduce litigation to cut down on fraud committed by unscrupulous lawyers and professional plaintiffs.''
TJ Cox: “I would just point out, we just saw an exhibit on the floor and, as is so often the case when one reads the headlines…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the purpose of a bill related to litigation and fraud during a House floor debate.
Share
More from TJ Cox
We cannot afford a death spiral of disinvestment and declining service for the transit system that gets our federal workforce to work each day.
I urge the Subcommittee to fully fund the administration's water infrastructure improvement for the Nation.
That interpretation is the correct interpretation. As the gentleman knows, that section of this resolution, section 7, is taken essentially verbatim from the rules of the House concerning the procedures for the Permanent Select Committee…
The gentlewoman is correct. It is my clear understanding that Congress did not, in adopting the Reform Act, intend to alter standards of liability under the Exchange Act.





