The original lawsuits were filed under State laws and in State courts. The gentleman brings a new matter to my attention, but I assure him that lawsuit was surely filed after January 4, after the date of introduction of this bill, which gets directly to the gentleman's point. The gentleman just speaks of motive, and I gave the gentleman my answer to his question, which is that I wanted to be sure, when we introduced that bill on January 4, that it was not retroactive. Indeed, Mr. Chairman, I was in a radio debate with a Member of the other body from California in which she alleged that this was retroactive.
TJ Cox: “The original lawsuits were filed under State laws and in State courts. The gentleman brings a new matter to my…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the introduction of a bill and its non-retroactive nature during a debate.
Share
More from TJ Cox
If I tried to tell company investors or shareholders that I was going to reorganize a company without showing them evidence of a need to do so or a way to measure success, a plan, I would be laughed out of the room.
The gentlewoman is correct. It is my clear understanding that Congress did not, in adopting the Reform Act, intend to alter standards of liability under the Exchange Act.
That interpretation is the correct interpretation. As the gentleman knows, that section of this resolution, section 7, is taken essentially verbatim from the rules of the House concerning the procedures for the Permanent Select Committee…
I am here, today, to urge the subcommittee to include sufficient funding to maintain and upgrade California's water storage and conveyance systems.





