I hope it is not considered pandering to the American people, as the previous speaker suggested, to permit our senior citizens who are receiving Social Security benefits to keep something of what they earn. In 1993, in the context of the largest tax increase in American history, President and the then Democrat Congress imposed a 70-percent income tax rate increase on senior citizens who work. An important part of the bill that we are now bringing to the floor is going to roll that back. It was criticized as a tax increase on seniors who are rich, on rich retirees, on rich Social Security beneficiaries. In fact, the 70-percent income tax rate increase on Social Security benefits started for senior citizens who work and who make as little as $30,000 a year. They are not, in my book, the rich. I do not think they are anywhere else in America. I hope all of us will take this opportunity to repeal that onerous tax increase.
TJ Cox: “I hope it is not considered pandering to the American people, as the previous speaker suggested, to permit our senior…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the repeal of a tax increase on Social Security benefits for working senior citizens.
Share
More from TJ Cox
The gentlewoman is correct. It is my clear understanding that Congress did not, in adopting the Reform Act, intend to alter standards of liability under the Exchange Act.
Does the gentleman from Massachusetts think that Article V of the Constitution distrusts democracy? Does the gentleman think when three-quarters of the State legislatures have to approve what we are doing here today by a bare majority…
we are gathered here to deal with a problem that none of us wants and we are agreed upon much more than we admit. The censure resolution, not the articles of impeachment, but the censure resolution states that William Jefferson Clinton has…
I wonder if I might inquire whether it is the chairman's further understanding that KEDO is assuming substantial debts with some estimates that these debts total over $40 million?





