our current President ran on a platform proclaiming change and reform. Today I wonder: What happened to those changes? Where is the reform? Last year, the President abandoned the cause of real campaign finance reform. Now the so-called candidate of change has embraced the status quo in the Federal Election Commission. Every candidate knows it takes months, sometimes years, to get an investigation of bad practices in political campaigns that too often go on in both parties in this country. The Federal Election Commission is crippled by low funding and partisan gridlock. So what did the candidate for change propose? He reappointed the same Federal Election Commission Commissioners who represent the partisan gridlock, and then in his new budget not only is the promised stronger Federal Election Commission missing, but funding for the FEC is actually cut. Ask the New York Times, one of America's greatest and most distinguished newspapers. Recently, it wrote on its editorial pages, Mr. Clinton set back the cause of campaign reform by shortchanging the Federal Elections Commission. The President's budget, In the words of the New York Times, fails to provide enough money for the agency to keep up with its current mission, much less for an expanded role. As I suggested earlier, it barely keeps up with its current mission. Candidate for change?…
Stephen Horn: “our current President ran on a platform proclaiming change and reform. Today I wonder: What happened to those changes?…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker criticizes the President's failure to deliver on campaign finance reform.
Share
More from Stephen Horn
Republicans, like the public and Congress, do not support taxpayer dollars being used to fund political campaigns. Even the Democratic majority does not support such funding. That is why their bill contains none. S. 3, as amended by the…
the die is cast. The date is set. The time has come to vote on the balanced budget amendment in the House. It is going to be on the calendar. Thanks to a successful discharge petition, Mr. Speaker, we will have a vote on this amendment in…
a recent poll in the Los Angeles Times asked respondents if they would support an employer mandate to fund universal health coverage for all Americans even if that might cost jobs. Not surprisingly, only one in six backed the idea. Yet…
I think it is time that America woke up and all of us, as colleagues, woke up as to what is going on in this Chamber. Not since 1910--and the end of the days of czar Joseph Cannon, the Republican Speaker--has this Chamber been under such…





