if I heard my distinguished colleague correctly, I would make two observations. First, this is a precedent being set on the military budget that has not been set on any other budget, and that is that we cannot make cuts; that we cannot offer amendments to make cuts, and the rules will not do it. We know that is not the case. We have made cuts in other programs. I will just let that sit there for whatever that is worth. The second point that I would make is that, if the issue is get this bill up on Tuesday and get it out by Wednesday night, this is a triumph of process over substance, and we ought to be about substance. We have time to deliberate here, and I am not trying to demagog the issue. I am willing to stay here all night like anyone else; but, when we are talking about $267 billion, slow the train down and let us have a deliberative and substantive discussion. Do not let process triumph over substance. If we are going to establish this precedent on the military budget, then establish this precedent on programs that deal with our youth, with our poor, with our aged, with our unemployed and other programs.
Ronald Dellums: “if I heard my distinguished colleague correctly, I would make two observations. First, this is a precedent being set on…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the military budget and the need for substantive debate over procedural efficiency.
Share
More from Ronald Dellums
let us talk about where we can cut. First, our whole approach to our force structure, our readiness levels, our modernization schedule, et cetera, are all based on a bible that was generated as a result of the Persian Gulf War. Remember…
Mr. Chairman, as I noted during the debate on the rule, I do not think that our very valuable committee process has succeeded fully in considering the weight and the merit of the issue before us. Despite that fact, I think that much has…
I would simply concur in the explanation of the amendment offered by my distinguished colleague from South Carolina, Mr. Spence. The amendment provides that the President must act consistent with United Nations Participation Act, simply…
This is really an extremely important effort on behalf of our Army and National Guard participating soldiers. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has stepped forward today with a piece of legislation that will be very important to 4,206…





