It would provide two opportunities to achieve what this gentleman believes to be a better balance of national security priorities. The motion would increase funding for two very important programs, would pay for these increases by reducing funding for star wars-type national missile defense programs contained in this bill. Specifically, the bill removes $109 million from star wars funding increases. It would increase funding, as the gentleman from Texas pointed out, impact aid assistance by $53 million. It would also plus- up the Corps SAM missile program by $56 million, taking it from the national missile defense program. The gentleman from Texas articulately discussed the matter of impact aid. I will not attempt to compete with those remarks. On the second matter, let me note that much has been made, and appropriately so, of the urgency of being able to deploy a theater missile defense. Corps SAM is a system that we need to deploy with our troops. It will travel with our forces and provide protection to them from tactical threats in the theater, the No. 1 priority threat that we have at this particular moment. Again, we should direct our scarce resources away from fanciful and extraordinary ideas, like star wars-type programs, and into programs of demonstrated requirements.
Ronald Dellums: “It would provide two opportunities to achieve what this gentleman believes to be a better balance of national security…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the motion to recommit regarding national security funding priorities.
Share
More from Ronald Dellums
It would place a limit on U.S. costs for handling the expansion of NATO to 10 percent of the total cost, or $2 billion, whichever is lesser, for fiscal years 1998 through 2010. With respect to background, Mr. Speaker, Congress, the House…
I would suggest that, Mr. Chairman, when one argues that our national defense is the most important or the only responsibility of the Federal Government, I would challenge that assertion. My reading of the Preamble to the Constitution is…
it is with an incredibly heavy heart that I take the well of the House of Representatives today because this will be the last time that I will do this. I have served in these chambers for 27 years, and it has been an extraordinary honor…
Mr. Chairman, as I noted during the debate on the rule, I do not think that our very valuable committee process has succeeded fully in considering the weight and the merit of the issue before us. Despite that fact, I think that much has…





