Mr. Chairman, this is perhaps the most significant vote that Members will make on the Department of Defense authorization bill for this fiscal year. Contained in this budget is $331,200,000 to begin advance procurement for 9 additional B-2 bombers. That is what is in the bill. What this amendment does is to strike that $331,200,000 from the B-2 account and places it in another account that I will discuss a little later. What is clearly before us, Mr. Chairman, is whether or not we ought to go forward with the B-2 bomber. The debate is not about having B-2 bombers. We already have 21 of them that we have paid for, that we have either developed, or are in the final stages of development. It is not about do we have B-2's. It is about spending $27 billion to restart production for an additional 9 B-2's for which significant authorities have not asked for, stated that they do not want, and stated that they do not need. A $27 billion program that nobody has asked for, no one wants, except the contractor and the subcontractors.
Ronald Dellums: “Mr. Chairman, this is perhaps the most significant vote that Members will make on the Department of Defense…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the Department of Defense authorization bill and the funding for additional B-2 bombers.
Share
More from Ronald Dellums
Mr. Chairman, let me surface an issue that has not been dealt with and just put it on the table so we all can look at it. That is that this bill, there is joint jurisdiction on this piece of legislation. The tragedy of this institution is…
I rise in opposition not to the substance of what my colleague is trying to do, but rather, on technical grounds. My staff and I have attempted to work with the gentleman's staff in trying to achieve some accommodation on this matter on…
the bill, H.R. 2754, provides the Congress of the United States with the opportunity to ratify an agreement, the purpose of which is to end government subsidies in shipbuilding. I believe that it is in the interest of the shipbuilding…
if you believe in one of the notions that one of my colleagues asserted, that people cannot move to peace because for years they have been killing each other, then we would still believe in the divine right of kings and the right of people…





