I am in agreement with the gentleman from Indiana who indicated that the McCloskey amendment does not mandate military aid, but I believe that my distinguished colleague from New York [Mr. Gilman] perhaps misspoke himself when he indicated that the bill was permissive on the issue of lifting the embargo. I would suggest that it does indeed mandate the lifting of the embargo. In the relevant part of the amendment entitled ``Termination of the Arms Embargo,'' it states as follows: ``The President shall'' and I underscore shall for the purposes of emphasis, ``terminate U.S. arms embargo on the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina upon the receipt from the Government of a request for assistance in exercising the right of self-determination under article 51 of the U.N. Charter.''
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the implications of the McCloskey amendment regarding military aid and the arms embargo.
Share
More from Ronald Dellums
April 24, 1994 marks the passage of 79 years since the planned campaign of murder by the Ottoman Turkish government against the Armenian leadership and Armenian people. The campaign, which lasted 8 years, killed 1.5 million Armenians and…
If the distinguished chairman will yield, I thank the gentleman for his concerns and for his advice and assistance concerning these and other important issues in our bill that related in part to foreign affairs. Relations among the…
It did not discuss it, and the gentleman and I full well know that we though that the Congressional Black Caucus would take the moral high ground in an area where we were all in agreement. The place where we were not all in agreement is on…
we now begin debate on a very important and serious issue, the nature of America's relationship and activities in Bosnia. There will be two amendments before the body, the McCloskey amendment in which, unilaterally, the United States would…





