I am in agreement with the gentleman from Indiana who indicated that the McCloskey amendment does not mandate military aid, but I believe that my distinguished colleague from New York [Mr. Gilman] perhaps misspoke himself when he indicated that the bill was permissive on the issue of lifting the embargo. I would suggest that it does indeed mandate the lifting of the embargo. In the relevant part of the amendment entitled ``Termination of the Arms Embargo,'' it states as follows: ``The President shall'' and I underscore shall for the purposes of emphasis, ``terminate U.S. arms embargo on the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina upon the receipt from the Government of a request for assistance in exercising the right of self-determination under article 51 of the U.N. Charter.''
Ronald Dellums: “I am in agreement with the gentleman from Indiana who indicated that the McCloskey amendment does not mandate military…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the implications of the McCloskey amendment regarding military aid and the arms embargo.
Share
More from Ronald Dellums
I would simply concur in the explanation of the amendment offered by my distinguished colleague from South Carolina, Mr. Spence. The amendment provides that the President must act consistent with United Nations Participation Act, simply…
It would provide two opportunities to achieve what this gentleman believes to be a better balance of national security priorities. The motion would increase funding for two very important programs, would pay for these increases by reducing…
To establish some reality to people who are listening to this debate, we already have 350 of these missiles. The debate is whether we buy 84 additional ones. I am saying that is the build up to build down. In my proposal we can stay within…
Mr. Chairman, this is perhaps the most significant vote that Members will make on the Department of Defense authorization bill for this fiscal year. Contained in this budget is $331,200,000 to begin advance procurement for 9 additional B-2…





