It did not discuss it, and the gentleman and I full well know that we though that the Congressional Black Caucus would take the moral high ground in an area where we were all in agreement. The place where we were not all in agreement is on the issue of the use of force, and we consciously did not deal with that question, and the gentleman from New York and this gentleman had a handshake agreement that the bill that we would introduce would be silent on that question. So, I am saying that before God and country, the answer to the gentleman.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Congressional Black Caucus's stance on a bill regarding the use of force.
Share
More from Ronald Dellums
the amendment before the body at this time is an amendment that would repeal, and I would repeat, repeal the requirement for Selective Service registration of 18-year-old men effective October 1, 1994. It does not, Mr. Chairman, apply to…
If the distinguished chairman will yield, I thank the gentleman for his concerns and for his advice and assistance concerning these and other important issues in our bill that related in part to foreign affairs. Relations among the…
My first observation would be, as you listen very carefully to this debate, it is a classic example of why significant policy with such extraordinary implications should not be offered on the floor and debated on the floor when you have…
Mr. Chairman, this amendment is a slick way to avoid paying our bills to the United Nations. This amendment is a little too cute. It pulls the rug out from under the United Nations--the problem is: We are standing on that same rug. This…





