I have here on a map the Cady mountain wilderness area, the proposed area. If Members will see where the bright spots are, they represent 640 acres of privately owned property. In between these borders, there are no roads currently existing within the bill. What my amendment would propose to do is leave open these existing roads through the middle of this proposed wilderness area so that these private property owners will have access to their property. It does no good to tell the property owners that they are going to be able to maintain their private property and maintain ownership, continue to pay taxes, continue to pay their mortgage if we do not allow them to have access to it. Mr. Chairman, this is the same thing that we have seen over and over again in many bills that have been put before this House and before these committees, is that they put up the false hope that someone is going to be able to maintain ownership of their private property but in reality it is a taking by the Federal Government of the private property rights of these owners, because we are, No. 1, diminishing the value without just compensation of their property, and, No. 2, we are refusing to allow them to have access to property that in many instances has been in a family for generations just in an effort to lock off this property from the valid private property owners who exist there.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing access rights for private property owners in relation to the Cady mountain wilderness area proposal.
Share
More from Richard Pombo
Yes, they are. All of the shiny dots currently represent a section of property which is privately owned; a section of property being 640 acres, or 1 square mile.
I quote: On January 20, 1993, William Jefferson Clinton took the oath prescribed by the Constitution of the United States to faithfully execute the office of President; implicit in that oath is the obligation that the President set an…
If Members will look at these valid private property areas that are included in this one map, and I have many others if anybody would like to see the others, they will see that without this guaranteed access, without leaving these roads…
Yes. Those are current roads, currently being used for access by those property owners. This bill would prohibit the use of those roads.





