So it would not bust budgets and Mr. Dye would not be able to back his U-Haul trailer up to the U.S. Treasury to take money because the U.S. Agency would be forced to be responsible for the first time in 40 years?
Richard Pombo: “So it would not bust budgets and Mr. Dye would not be able to back his U-Haul trailer up to the U.S. Treasury to take…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the goals of proposed legislation regarding budget responsibility.
Share
More from Richard Pombo
the estimated oil that would result out of ANWR would be enough to fuel the entire State of Massachusetts for 75 years. Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from Alaska (Mr. Young), the man that has been entrusted to represent…
Mr. Chairman, it is always interesting to get into these debates, and sometimes I wish we could all live in a perfect world. We are in the middle of a very serious crisis on our national forests and on our public lands. The Udall amendment…
the adoption of this conference report will allow America to develop the vast oil and gas resources of the Arctic Coastal Plain and help ensure our energy security for ourselves and our children. It is without exaggeration that I say that…
I do appreciate Mr. Markey's kind words about at least one provision in the bill. I do appreciate that he did not want to waste that sign, since he had his staff make up the poster and they put a lot of hard work into that. And even though…





