On the recordMarch 27, 1998
so the people that are affected by this directly, those people who have chosen to live and work near our national forests, are opposed to it; and yet this amendment, if adopted, would adopt this policy?
Source
govinfo.govRichard Pombo: “so the people that are affected by this directly, those people who have chosen to live and work near our national…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing opposition to an amendment related to national forests.
Share
More from Richard Pombo
Jun 29, 2006
Yes, sir. Reclaiming my time, it actually gives the State the first 50 miles that they do not have to do anything, and they could ban anything within that first 50 miles.
May 25, 2006
the estimated oil that would result out of ANWR would be enough to fuel the entire State of Massachusetts for 75 years. Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from Alaska (Mr. Young), the man that has been entrusted to represent…
Jun 16, 2004
Mr. Chairman, the amendment says that none of the funds made available by this act may be used to adversely affect the physical integrity of Indian sacred sites on Federal lands as such terms are defined in the Executive Order No. 13007…
Jun 29, 2006
I yield 5 minutes to one of the chief authors of the legislation, the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Peterson).
Other voices in this conversation
