I have a list from an environmental impact statement for the Sacramento River system control plan which listed the following Federal laws which must be complied with before the levee repairs could begin: National Historic Preservation Act, Archaeological and Historical Preservation Act, Archaeological Resources Protection Act, Preservation of Historic Properties, Abandoned Shipwreck Act reviews, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Coastal Zone Management Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Estuary Protection Act, the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, and it goes on and on and on. It has over 20 Federal laws and State laws that we had to abide by before we could repair the levee. All we are asking for is to allow us to maintain our levees. That is all we are asking for, to protect human life and private property. This is not that difficult.
Richard Pombo: “I have a list from an environmental impact statement for the Sacramento River system control plan which listed the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the regulatory requirements for levee repairs in the Sacramento River system.
Share
More from Richard Pombo
today I rise to speak in favor of H.R. 366, the Vocational and Technical Education for the Future Act. Vocational education is an extremely important component of secondary education for millions of students. It is too often neglected at…
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 1658 would amendment the Railroad Right-of-Way Conveyance Validation Act to legalize, validate, and confirm as far as any interest of the United States is concerned two additional conveyances in San Joaquin County…
I rise just to point out that the estimated oil from ANWR would fuel the State of Connecticut for 132 years. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from California (Mr. Nunes).
Yes, sir. Reclaiming my time, it actually gives the State the first 50 miles that they do not have to do anything, and they could ban anything within that first 50 miles.





