I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Chairman, in my statement I did not say that we were not allowing the grazing, the mining, the private property owners, the hiking, the rock collecting and such to continue, because the bill does specifically allow those activities to continue. But what I was trying to point out in my statement is that it is a false promise to tell people that these activities are going to continue if the access to those activities to no longer allowed. That is the reason for my amendment.
Richard Pombo: “I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Chairman, in my statement I did not say that we were not allowing the grazing…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill on land use and access to various activities.
Share
More from Richard Pombo
I pledge to the gentleman that as we move forward with a long-term solution, that the interests of all the States bordering the Gulf will be protected, and the gentleman will be part of those discussions.
on July 12, 2005, I missed four recorded votes. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on H.R. 739, the Occupational Safety and Health Small Business Day in Court Act of 2005 (rollcall No. 369); ``yea'' on H.R. 740, the…
obviously ANWR is a controversial issue and it is something that this House has debated a number of times. This House has passed it a number of times. It is somewhat ironic that here, at 2 o'clock in the morning, as Mr. Moran points out…
The bills that we are doing by UC right now are bills that have been before the committee for a long time. The particular bill you are objecting to is a bill that the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Ortiz) has been working on for years. It is…





