Mr. Chairman, we just had a vote on an amendment that I offered which would have protected the property rights of those in-holders that we are talking about in this particular amendment, unfortunately that amendment was defeated. My friends voted against it. They said that the Federal Government could come in and control the land that they did not own; that they could tell private property owners what they could do or could not do with their private property, and the will of the House was that that would proceed; that we would do that to those private property owners. Now, having voted that way, having made that decision and told those property owners that we were going to control their property, even though we did not know own it, the least we can do at that point is to approve this amendment, because this amendment now says that that is our priority, we have to go in and buy out those in-holders. We have to go in and pay those people for their land, because see we do not want to protect their property rights, we voted against that, we said we want to control them. Now, the least we can do is pay them for the land that we are taking from them.
Richard Pombo: “Mr. Chairman, we just had a vote on an amendment that I offered which would have protected the property rights of those…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to property rights and government control over land.
Share
More from Richard Pombo
I missed recorded votes today in order to be with my family in California for an unexpected family emergency. I would like my intentions made known for my constituents in the 11th district. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on…
I realize that the gentleman is correct when he talks about authorizing an appropriations bill and the effect that my amendment would have. But I would urge the Chair to rule the amendment in order because what I am trying to do is strip…
I pledge to the gentleman that as we move forward with a long-term solution, that the interests of all the States bordering the Gulf will be protected, and the gentleman will be part of those discussions.
I hope it is a new era that we are entering into because when I took over as chairman of the Committee on Resources, one of the things that I did commit to was getting Members of Congress outside the Beltway, out across the country to…





