If this legislation were to pass and in a few months when it is law, would Fish and Wildlife act in the same way and go out and just designate everything that they see as potential habitat and gain control of it? Or would they prioritize the areas? Mr. McINTOSH. It is my expectation that they would prioritize it for areas which are in fact critical habitat for species such as the bald eagle, but leave citizens such as Mr. Dye alone in their private property and actually seek out those areas that are critical to preserve that habitat.
Richard Pombo: “If this legislation were to pass and in a few months when it is law, would Fish and Wildlife act in the same way and go…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of proposed legislation on Fish and Wildlife's habitat designation.
Share
More from Richard Pombo
Opening up ANWR would give the State of Wisconsin 83 years of supply; and with that, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Tennessee (Mrs. Blackburn).
It was about 99 years ago when Teddy Roosevelt used his State of the Union address to urge Congress to create a national forest system to ensure proper stewardship of these tremendous assets that we have in our huge public lands. And by…
The bills that we are doing by UC right now are bills that have been before the committee for a long time. The particular bill you are objecting to is a bill that the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Ortiz) has been working on for years. It is…
I pledge to the gentleman that as we move forward with a long-term solution, that the interests of all the States bordering the Gulf will be protected, and the gentleman will be part of those discussions.





