On the recordJanuary 23, 2017
I strongly agree with that and yet, here we are where repealing the ACA without a replacement as the Republicans have already begun to do, would cost roughly $350 billion through 2027.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Stark emphasizes the financial implications of repealing the ACA without a replacement.
Share
More from Pete Stark
Feb 6, 2012
The new health reform law is promoting public-private initiatives to incentivize high-quality, efficient care.
Jan 23, 2017
Those 43,000 people are not just anecdotes. They are people too, who will lose their care if this is repealed.
Jul 11, 2016
In 2007 Pete Stark wrote that he believed that, on balance, the law may have done more harm than good.
Feb 1, 2012
Isn't it true that in most of the liquor stores and other establishments of that type they charge no fees for cashing the checks because they want people to get the cash to gamble? In many of our districts in California they don't have to…
Other voices in this conversation
