On the recordJanuary 23, 2017
I strongly agree with that and yet, here we are where repealing the ACA without a replacement as the Republicans have already begun to do, would cost roughly $350 billion through 2027.
Source
congress.govPete Stark: “I strongly agree with that and yet, here we are where repealing the ACA without a replacement as the Republicans have…”
Editor's note · Context
Stark emphasizes the financial implications of repealing the ACA without a replacement.
Share
More from Pete Stark
Jan 23, 2017
What is shocking to me is that you want to spend even more than that and yet leave 30 million people without health care.
Sep 20, 2012
But these projections have turned out to be incorrect. And since the passage of the ACA, Medicare Advantage enrollment has increased, and the premiums have decreased.
Jul 11, 2016
Turning a physician's decision to refer a patient into a marketable commodity.
Jul 11, 2016
It gave every shyster and promoter a loophole. . . . We now have to keep rewriting the laws like the tax code.
Other voices in this conversation
