Political Quotes

Pete Stark: I adamantly oppose H.R. 4576, the Defense Appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2001. This bill spends $288.5 billion for…

On the recordJune 7, 2000
I adamantly oppose H.R. 4576, the Defense Appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2001. This bill spends $288.5 billion for defense programs. However, this amount does not include the $8.6 billion already passed by the House in the Military Construction Appropriations bill (H.R. 4425), nor does it include the $13 billion expected to be allocated for defense needs in the upcoming Energy and Water Appropriations bill. The three measures provide $310 billion on defense needs alone. Monday, the Washington Post reported that the Joint Chiefs of Staff are preparing to request increases in military spending of more than $30 billion per year over the next 10 years starting in FY 2002. The U.S. Congress must not yield to the whims of the Joint Chiefs and the demands of military contractors when the American people have real needs that Government can provide. This is the wrong time to throw money at pork-barrel defense projects such as the national missile defense (NMD) system and the F-22 program. The U.S. is experiencing unprecedented economic growth and the federal budget is balanced. Now is the time that we should provide health insurance for the eleven million children without it, provide a Medicare prescription drug benefit for 39 million Medicare beneficiaries, and ensure solvency of the Social Security and Medicare systems for the millions of baby boomers in their near retirement years.
Said by
Pete Stark
California

Editor's note · Context

Opposing the Defense Appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2001 and advocating for domestic needs.

Share

More from Pete Stark

Jun 7, 2012

I thank the gentleman for yielding. I rise in strong opposition to H.R. 436, one more piece of Republican legislation that protects special interests at the expense of working with families. This is just another message in an attempt to…

govinfo.gov
Apr 26, 2012

I am going to go on record again making clear the strong opposition that Democrats have to the House Republican proposal.

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

It gave every shyster and promoter a loophole. We now have to keep rewriting the laws like the tax code.

congress.gov
May 10, 2012

The legislation we are considering today is quite possibly the moral low-point of this House Republican Majority. Not only does it negate a law that was agreed to just last year to cut the deficit, it makes unconscionable cuts to safety…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation