Political Quotes

Pete Stark: I oppose H.R. 4205, the Defense Authorization for Fiscal Year 2001 bill for a number of reasons. This bill spends too…

On the recordMay 18, 2000
I oppose H.R. 4205, the Defense Authorization for Fiscal Year 2001 bill for a number of reasons. This bill spends too much for a national missile defense system that the President hasn't even determined to deploy and it seeks to keep defense contractor coffers plentiful. H.R. 4205 authorizes $2.2 billion for national missile defense (NMD) systems when President Clinton hasn't made a decision on whether or not to deploy such a system. The President had indicated that he will make his decision later this year. But the longer he waits, the more evidence indicates that deployment is unwise. Last month, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) delivered a devastating blow to NMD proponents when they calculated the costs of building and operating the Administration's defenses system at almost $60 billion. For months now, the Pentagon has insisted that the cost of the Administration's system over the next six years was a modest $12.7 billion. The Pentagon was shocked once again when a recent poll was released that national missile defense is an extremely low priority for Americans. Improving education, protecting Social Security and Medicare, and improving health care coverage are all significantly higher priorities than defense-related matters. I would much rather spend $12 billion to cover 11 million uninsured children--the cost of my MediKids bill.
Said by
Pete Stark
California

Editor's note · Context

Opposing the Defense Authorization for Fiscal Year 2001 bill regarding national missile defense funding.

Share

More from Pete Stark

Apr 26, 2012

The 75-year target doesn't bother me much, but I will come back and ask Mr. Herger, he will find out what it is like.

congress.gov
Jun 20, 2012

$8.6 trillion. Do you have any idea what the two wars we are fighting and not paying for costs over the same period of time?

congress.gov
Jan 23, 2017

What is shocking to me is that you want to spend even more than that and yet leave 30 million people without health care.

congress.gov
Jan 23, 2017

Two leading doctors at Harvard Medical School have concluded that 43,000 people will be killed annually if the ACA is repealed without a replacement.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation