Oh, no, it is a question that I hope the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Shaw) will answer to the seniors in Florida, and that the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Hayworth) will answer to the seniors in Arizona, and the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. English) will answer to the seniors in Pennsylvania, and that the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Weller) will answer to the seniors in Illinois, because they have denied their own constituents the chance to buy these prescription drugs which they so vitally need at no cost to the Federal Government. What kind of assistance is that to your constituents, I ask the gentleman rhetorically? And the answer is they do not want any prescription drug benefit. They do not want to save Medicare as we know it. I think that should be pointed out in this debate today.
Pete Stark: “Oh, no, it is a question that I hope the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Shaw) will answer to the seniors in Florida, and…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the lack of prescription drug benefits for seniors during a debate.
Share
More from Pete Stark
Two leading doctors at Harvard Medical School have concluded that 43,000 people will be killed annually if the ACA is repealed without a replacement.
I strongly oppose these budget cuts which are kind of like the cable company starting to bill you for a service while you are at home waiting for them to show up and connect it.
If we had vouchers, or whatever you want to call premium support things, the Medicare would stop being a defined benefit plan and become a defined contribution plan, would it not?
The CBO has said it would lead to an increase in overall national health spending as seniors and people with disabilities are moved into less efficient, more costly private plans.





