I rise today to call for the use of modern statistical methods in order to assure an accurate census in the year 2000. Without this, the undercount of the urban and rural poor and minorities will persist. H.R. 472, the Local Census Quality Check Act, would prevent the use of statistical methods by requiring the use of a postcensus local review as part of each decennial census. Representative Dan Miller's bill would require the Census Bureau to review the count of local addresses a second time--nine weeks after the census field work is done. This new requirement will consume so much time that the Census Bureau will be unable to carry out its plans to use modern statistical methods. The 2000 census will suffer from the same flaws as the 1990 census--millions of people missed and millions of others counted twice. Mr. Speaker, an accurate count is essential to California. The population in the 13th district of California was undercounted by 11,857 for the years 1991-1999. This translated into nearly $32 million in lost federal funds. In addition to formula funds, hospitals and community clinics which provide vital services in our communities use census data to determine where to build and whom to serve. Without an accurate count, our citizens will again be denied essential services.
Pete Stark: “I rise today to call for the use of modern statistical methods in order to assure an accurate census in the year 2000.…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the importance of accurate census methods and the impact of proposed legislation on census accuracy.
Share
More from Pete Stark
the Congressional Budget Office estimates that repealing the major coverage provisions of the Affordable Care Act will terminate coverage for--sorry, not 30, but 32 million people.
Basically Republicans want to take away Medicare's guaranteed benefits and replace it with a voucher and put the insurance companies back in charge.
Social Security has been there for Americans for 77 years. I hope we can continue to work to make it strong for another 77 years.
I would first of all like to try to make it the protocol in this committee--I am not succeeding too well--that we strike from our lexicon the word 'disability.'





