Mr. Speaker, I could not begin to match the eloquence of the previous speakers on this side who would suggest to the American public that they are at grave risk of having their Constitution damaged by a capricious majority who would today--in kind of a television stunt that is hardly worthy of a second rate talk show host--try and convince the American people that they are doing something to save them money or to save the Government. It is again a sham. There is much that we could be doing in this body that is important, and obviously we are not. But it is important to note what might have happened had this kind of a silly constitutional amendment been agreed upon earlier. Social Security would now be bankrupt. It would not have been saved in the 1984 legislation which did not receive a two-thirds vote. As the Republicans have repeatedly tried to raise the taxes on the senior citizens for Medicare in their own rule which required two-thirds last year, they had to waive the rule to increase the premiums on Medicare beneficiaries. That was a Republican move. The health coverage availability and affordability bill would have imposed additional taxes on withdrawals from medical savings accounts, an equally silly idea, but again the Republicans had to waive their own rule. The Republicans could not operate, they do not know how to operate the House with a two-thirds rule they have in here now.
Pete Stark: “Mr. Speaker, I could not begin to match the eloquence of the previous speakers on this side who would suggest to the…”
Editor's note · Context
Criticizing a proposed constitutional amendment and Republican actions regarding Social Security and Medicare.
Share
More from Pete Stark
It is apparent to me in this hearing from the testimony presented today that the Democrats' health care law is unconstitutional and will rob Americans of their current health plan and further hinder economic growth.
I dislike the notion that we need to increase costs for beneficiaries in order to fix the physician payment system.
I thank the gentleman for yielding. I rise in strong opposition to H.R. 436, one more piece of Republican legislation that protects special interests at the expense of working with families. This is just another message in an attempt to…
Thank you for holding this hearing and thank our witnesses for their service.





