Mr. Speaker, this is a perfect example of the triumph of ideology over American pragmatism. The Republicans say they are going to save the fund. First they take $86 billion out by a tax break. Then they take another $280 billion out by the cuts they are going to make. Then their solution is to pick a solution that does not work. There was a study done by the Research Triangle Institute which says it spends 17 rac{1}{2} percent more for select than it does in the system we have today, which means they are going to spend it down quicker. The real result of their efforts is to get rid of Medicare. They want to break the system 17 percent faster by putting people into select. That is not a solution. It simply makes the problem worse. Everyone should understand it and vote 'no.'
Pete Stark: “Mr. Speaker, this is a perfect example of the triumph of ideology over American pragmatism. The Republicans say they are…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of Republican proposals on Medicare funding.
Share
More from Pete Stark
The 75-year target doesn't bother me much, but I will come back and ask Mr. Herger, he will find out what it is like.
Basically Republicans want to take away Medicare's guaranteed benefits and replace it with a voucher and put the insurance companies back in charge.
I thank the gentleman for yielding. I rise in strong opposition to H.R. 436, one more piece of Republican legislation that protects special interests at the expense of working with families. This is just another message in an attempt to…
The CBO has said it would lead to an increase in overall national health spending as seniors and people with disabilities are moved into less efficient, more costly private plans.





