Our Democratic substitute addresses a real issue of concern with respect to flexible spending accounts in the use-it-or-lose-it rule. We agree with the author of this legislation that it is unwise to create an incentive for people to spend foolishly or frivolously for a benefit that they might lose, and we have the Washington Business Group and 50 major corporate members are clear on the issue. They want the changes and they want the money carried over into FSAs. The position is shared by their employees. The real question here is whether we should pay for this. And it will be expensive. It is $8 billion. That is money that could be used in many programs, education programs, environmental programs, health programs, and it is a principle to which we are dedicated, and that is that we would like to expand health care in this country, but we have never offered a plan that we will not pay for.
Pete Stark: “Our Democratic substitute addresses a real issue of concern with respect to flexible spending accounts in the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of flexible spending accounts and the costs associated with proposed changes.
Share
More from Pete Stark
The CBO has said it would lead to an increase in overall national health spending as seniors and people with disabilities are moved into less efficient, more costly private plans.
the Congressional Budget Office estimates that repealing the major coverage provisions of the Affordable Care Act will terminate coverage for--sorry, not 30, but 32 million people.
I happen to be a fan of his bill to get rid of this idea that if a physician doesn't take Medicare, they are out of the system for 2 years.
I am going to go on record again making clear the strong opposition that Democrats have to the House Republican proposal.





