I now have the privilege of yielding 2 minutes to the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Critz).
Mike Levin
The Public Record
Mike Levin is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for California's 49th congressional district since January 3, 2019. A member of the Democratic Party, Levin has focused on issues such as climate change, healthcare, and reproductive rights during his time in office. He has been an advocate for policies that promote access to in vitro fertilization and has emphasized the importance of bipartisan cooperation in Congress.
I now yield 3 minutes to another very distinguished member of our committee, the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pascrell).
The Republicans have taken a 180-degree turn on helping with student loans. The Republican budget said ``no,'' and in February, Governor Mitt Romney said this: The right course for America is to make sure that we provide loans to the…
I now yield 30 seconds to the distinguished gentleman from New York (Mr. Israel).
Let me finish. You didn't yield at all to us, so let me finish. It has to be a factory that's built here. I yield to the gentleman from California.
I now yield 3 minutes to another very active member of our committee, the gentleman from California, Xavier Becerra.
I wish to thank the Senator from Tennessee for his constructive comments. He and I have spoken about trying to work on a relevant standard at the beginning of a bill as a way of moving a bill forward with the greatest possible leniency…
Yet the provisions that, in fact, disproportionately benefit the wealthy, including the reduction for capital gains and dividends, the Republicans would protect from any changes. The Republican priorities could not be clearer when it comes…
No. What the Republicans would do would be to send the decisions already there in large measure to insurance companies. I reserve the balance of my time.
It is now my privilege to yield 3 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Clay).
Let me just say it is strange to say you save something by destroying it. That is 1984 in 2012. I now yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from New Jersey. (Mr. ANDREWS asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)
It's curious. You're talking about, according to CBO, a board whose operation would be triggered in 2022. You come here and scare people. It doesn't work. You talk about rationing. You're talking about an operation 10 years from now. Right…
I now yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from Texas, a member of our committee, Mr. Doggett.
I now yield 3 minutes to the distinguished member of our committee, Mr. Blumenauer, from the proud State of Oregon.
I now yield 2 minutes to our ranking member on the Rules Committee, the gentlelady from New York (Ms. Slaughter).
I now yield 1 minute to Mr. Critz from the great State of Pennsylvania, a gentleman who is most active on these issues.
I now yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Maine (Mr. Michaud) who is very active in trade matters.
I now yield 2 minutes to Mr. Pascrell from the great State of New Jersey, another very active member of our committee.
I now yield 1 minute to the distinguished Representative from Maryland (Ms. Edwards).
I now yield 2 minutes to another conferee, the gentleman from California (Mr. Becerra).
It's now my pleasure to yield 1 minute to our distinguished leader, Ms. Pelosi, from the great State of California.
I now yield 2 minutes to Mr. Waxman, a member of the conference committee and the ranking member of the Energy and Commerce Committee. (Mr. WAXMAN asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks and include extraneous…
I thank both of my colleagues for working with me to address my questions about the Leahy-Cornyn amendment.
I thank the Senator for that clarification. In addition to the precise wording of amendment 1483 and clear congressional intent that the phrase used in the new Criminal Code section not be imported to Federal securities law, the definition…
One question that has arisen is whether the definition of ``material information'' in the new Criminal Code section your amendment creates is intended to or could affect other parts of the STOCK Act since the same term also appears in a…





