Whereas, under the Johnson proposal, Part B would not have to be paid for by retirees in order to have TRICARE provided to them.
Mike Levin: “Whereas, under the Johnson proposal, Part B would not have to be paid for by retirees in order to have TRICARE provided…”
On the recordJune 7, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the Johnson proposal related to TRICARE benefits for retirees.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Sep 3, 2026
My vote today does not reflect a position on changing the composition and structure of the Supreme Court.
Oct 3, 2026
Her passion for helping others also led her to establish Working Women Winning, a program that equips women with the skills, connections, and opportunities necessary to build rewarding careers and achieve financial stability.
Sep 3, 2026
There is no other acceptable remedy for this corrupt abuse of power and weaponization of taxpayer dollars.
Oct 8, 2026
I am also concerned that, following staffing cuts in 2025, USDA has failed to fill critical positions that support coordination with the Department of Veterans Affairs on veteran hunger.





