The Dodd amendment addresses a second problem with the text of the balanced budget amendment. The joint resolution, as currently drafted, requires that the United States be engaged in military conflict which "causes an imminent and serious military threat to national security and is so declared" by Congress. That word "and" in the current language creates two requirements: First, that there be a declaration by Congress and, second, that there be an imminent and serious threat to national security. In other words, the word "and," creates a second requirement--the actual existence of a threat--which opens this up to judicial review and creates a real problem which is corrected by the Dodd amendment. The last thing that we need at a time when our Nation faces an imminent and serious threat is to place in question the legitimacy of Federal spending to meet that threat. When our national security is at stake, we cannot afford to wait for the courts to give a stamp of approval to emergency spending programs. The Dodd amendment would address this problem by making it clear that a congressional declaration that an imminent and serious threat to the national security would alone be sufficient to trigger the exception.
Mike Levin: “The Dodd amendment addresses a second problem with the text of the balanced budget amendment. The joint resolution, as…”
On the recordFebruary 12, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the Dodd amendment related to the balanced budget amendment and national security.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Jul 29, 2026
Congress must now work in a bipartisan, bicameral fashion to authorize the Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses and write them into law with clear oversight, clear benchmarks, and clear connections to permanent disposal.
Sep 3, 2026
Congress should be protecting the powers entrusted to it by the Constitution, not voting to surrender them.
Aug 2, 2026
When Michaelle’s son Tristan was diagnosed with an ultra-rare genetic condition, she and her husband, Kevin, refused to accept that there was nothing to be done.
Sep 3, 2026
My vote today does not reflect a position on changing the composition and structure of the Supreme Court.





