I make the point that the chairman has on other occasions this evening waived the rules, and certainly this would not be a precedent. He could do it if he had the will to do it. Again, I think just as on my other two amendments, he has failed to give an opportunity to have some very serious issues heard. He is doing it, again, not because there should not be room for this kind of amendment, but simply because in this case he wants to protect the administration and allow them to continue to divvy up the spoils and give contracts to cronies.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the chairman's refusal to allow amendments during a legislative session.
Share
More from Maxine Waters
Mr. Meeks' bill closes documented gaps around multiclass governance structures. Multiclass governance structures are those where corporate insiders or beneficial owners retain an outsized amount of voting power relative to their shares…
Now, this so-called e-delivery provision makes electronic delivery the default communication method for all investors, whether they like it or not. AARP research indicates that a majority of American investors, 80 percent of which are 55…
Mr. Speaker, there is a lot that Congress can do to help our community financial institutions. This includes taking up deposit insurance reform bills like the ones that I and my committee Republicans have put forward. Increasing deposit…





