I beg to differ with the gentleman from Wisconsin. This has everything to do with Enron. As a matter of fact, I think the American public must know and understand the difference between this side of the aisle and that side of the aisle. We are about the business of protecting consumers, and we are about the business of allowing the average person to have their day in court. This bill would make it more difficult. It would put obstacles in the way. It would send class action lawsuits to the Federal court, which are overjammed. We do not have enough judges there. We have the big drug cases there. These cases would be backlogged, and they know it. They are creating obstacles to people getting their fair day in court. Members heard some of the cases referred to, where class action lawsuits are the only way people can get any justice. Let me remind Members of just a few of them. As a matter of fact, the average person would not be able to go into court and get any justice against Enron. It would only be through class action lawsuits. Remember Firestone? They knowingly sold defective tires, where tread separation caused more than 800 injuries and 271 deaths. They failed to recall and replace defective tires in a timely manner. What about Monsanto? They hid 40 years' worth of dumping of toxic PCBs, mercury, lead, and mustard gas in Anniston, Alabama.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the impact of proposed legislation on class action lawsuits and consumer protection.
Share
More from Maxine Waters
Mr. Speaker, I wish we were here on the House floor this morning debating solutions that would reduce grocery bills, lower housing costs, end Trump's tariffs that are strangling American small businesses and manufacturers, solve the…
I rise to speak on H.R. 5616, the $2.50 for America's 250th Act, sponsored by the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Aderholt). This legislation directs the Treasury Secretary to mint and issue a $2.50 collectible coin to celebrate the 250th…
Mr. Chair, Republicans claim that section 202 purports to modernize retirement options for nurses, teachers, and nonprofit workers. Let me be clear: It does not. In reality, this provision opens these workers' retirement accounts called…
I oppose Mr. Self's amendment to strike section 307 of the INVEST Act. Section 307 is identical to H.R. 3357 sponsored by guess who? It is sponsored by Mr. Meeks. It closes gaps in the disclosures made to investors where there are…





