Mark DeSaulnier

I hope they investigate their political consultants as well.

You've got something--a product out there--that's leading to deaths.

I'm sorry that many moral, ethical people who are in public service have to go through this.

It's a problem that a functioning Congress would come up with a bipartisan solution.

There are certainly shared responsibility. I would argue there is much more on the other side.

Did you do any internal studies about how many critically ill children or adults might die as a result of being forced to leave the United States under this new policy?

To live, she relies on a weekly infusion that's unavailable in her home country.

Somebody should be held accountable for doing this and it needs to be corrected.

I will tell you, Mr. Robbins, if you try to remove her, knowing my constituents, you better bring a lot of buses, because a lot of us are going to be arrested trying to protect her.

The hottest places in hell are reserved for individuals who remain neutral at times of moral crisis.

There are people who don't, in my view, want to have a solution because it works for them politically.

Most of us on this side want to have a secure border, but we want to have a humane border

There is certainly shared responsibility. I would argue there is much more on the other side.

The administration decided to cast out some of the most vulnerable and defenseless people on Earth.

His mother fears that returning to Guyana now would be, quote, 'signing my son's death warrant.'

This policy is completely at odds with American values.

While the investigation is ongoing, CDC advises that individuals consider not using e-cigarettes because, as of now, this is the primary means of preventing this type of severe lung disease, and that e-cigarette use is never safe for…

I like to recommend books--'Our Daily Meds.' It's a book by a former New York Times reporter.

Tax treatment aside, would you consider raising your prices so it was more equivalent to cigarettes?

You have made more money, so the retailers are not motivated to sell to children.

She also says, of the assessment of JUUL's curriculum shows a company with attentions to mislead and misrepresent its dangers to youth.

She says, and she publicly stated, that your curriculum, quote--this is Dr. Halpern-Felsher of Stanford--her quote is 'does not meet standards to be an evidence-based curriculum to fully educate youth and prevent their use of JUULs.'

It has come to the committee's attention that JUUL falsely claimed it partnered with Stanford University to create a vaping prevention curriculum.

I am trying to control my anger, to be perfectly honest.

Why should it take long for us to look at the measurement and the content of what is in these products and measure it against what we already know about secondhand smoke?