Mark DeSaulnier
The Public Record
Mark James DeSaulnier is a U.S. Representative for California's 10th congressional district, having served since January 6, 2015. A member of the Democratic Party, he has focused on issues such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure during his time in office. DeSaulnier has been an advocate for environmental protection and has worked on legislation aimed at addressing climate change. Before his tenure in Congress, he served in the California State Senate and the California State Assembly, where he gained experience in state-level governance.
there is certainly shared responsibility. I would argue there is much more on the other side.
The hottest places in hell are reserved for individuals who remain neutral at times of moral crisis.
most of us on this side want to have a secure border, but we want to have a humane border
His mother fears that returning to Guyana now would be, quote, 'signing my son's death warrant.'
I will tell you, Mr. Robbins, if you try to remove her, knowing my constituents, you better bring a lot of buses, because a lot of us are going to be arrested trying to protect her.
The administration decided to cast out some of the most vulnerable and defenseless people on Earth.
there are people who don't, in my view, want to have a solution because it works for them politically.
somebody should be held accountable for doing this and it needs to be corrected.
Did you do any internal studies about how many critically ill children or adults might die as a result of being forced to leave the United States under this new policy?
I'm sorry that many moral, ethical people who are in public service have to go through this.
it's a problem that a functioning Congress would come up with a bipartisan solution.
there are certainly shared responsibility. I would argue there is much more on the other side.
To live, she relies on a weekly infusion that's unavailable in her home country.
While the investigation is ongoing, CDC advises that individuals consider not using e-cigarettes because, as of now, this is the primary means of preventing this type of severe lung disease, and that e-cigarette use is never safe for…
I like to recommend books--'Our Daily Meds.' It's a book by a former New York Times reporter.
She says, and she publicly stated, that your curriculum, quote--this is Dr. Halpern-Felsher of Stanford--her quote is 'does not meet standards to be an evidence-based curriculum to fully educate youth and prevent their use of JUULs.'
You have made more money, so the retailers are not motivated to sell to children.
It has come to the committee's attention that JUUL falsely claimed it partnered with Stanford University to create a vaping prevention curriculum.
She also says, of the assessment of JUUL's curriculum shows a company with attentions to mislead and misrepresent its dangers to youth.
Tax treatment aside, would you consider raising your prices so it was more equivalent to cigarettes?
We don't want our kids to be guinea pigs for this experiment, especially when we saw what happened the first time around when big tobacco 1.0 targeted our kids.





