It's bad enough that the people who control this body aren't interested in creating jobs for the American people. But now, if people want new leadership in the House, if they want a Congress that will finally focus on job creation, they're foiled by restrictive election laws designed to suppress the vote. Guess which populations are disenfranchised by strict photo ID requirements and other barriers to political participation? It's not the wealthiest 1 percent. It's not the affluent and the comfortable. It's not, frankly, the base of the Republican Party. It's disproportionately communities of color and low-income families who are having their rights undermined and even stripped away. These laws, passing in State after State, are underhanded. They're an attempt to consolidate political power. They are unfair, undemocratic. And voting rights are among the most precious privileges that we have as citizens, and they must be protected. ____________________
Lynn C. Woolsey: “It's bad enough that the people who control this body aren't interested in creating jobs for the American people. But…”
Share
More from Lynn C. Woolsey
We know that the smelt has its place in the ecosystem and that, yes, indeed Southern California needs water.
I just want to repeat what I said in my opening remarks. Nothing in the proposed rule would have applied to children working on their parents' family farm. The proposed rule maintains the parental exemption. But again, to remind everybody…
I am proud to cosponsor this amendment offered by my friend from California. As she clearly stated, this amendment would cut $19.2 billion of Pentagon spending and bring the overall spending down to $500 billion while at the same time…
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from California will be postponed. Amendment Offered by Mr. Markey





