First, this would have been part of the debate in the committee had I not been asked not to bring it up in committee but to bring it as an amendment to the floor, and I was asked by the majority party to do that. So please be clear, this is not something I did not want to bring to the committee. Second of all, when my colleague talks about the funding being arbitrary, our decision on this funding came from the same place that our whole committee's decision to double the funding for NSF came from. We do not know how much money we need. We know we need more, and I know with my amendment we need something. So I want to get started and the public wants to get started so that we can scientifically decide what is good and what is not good.
Lynn C. Woolsey: “First, this would have been part of the debate in the committee had I not been asked not to bring it up in committee but…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding decisions and the amendment process during a floor debate.
Share
More from Lynn C. Woolsey
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from California will be postponed. Amendment Offered by Mr. Markey
A few months ago, the Republican majority passed their budget blueprint which, unbelievably, called for the complete elimination, over 10 years' time, of funding for the Social Services Block Grant. This program is designed to help people…
I thank the gentleman for leading this Special Order. Mr. Speaker, yesterday we were debating work requirements under the TANF program. Well, after we've all listed the issues that the Republicans have refused to address in this Congress…
Our ranking member today has proven something that's very clear to me: this is baloney. The arguments are baloney. So baloney, baloney, baloney. We're here, Mr. Speaker, standing on the House floor for the 31st time with the majority…





