First, this would have been part of the debate in the committee had I not been asked not to bring it up in committee but to bring it as an amendment to the floor, and I was asked by the majority party to do that. So please be clear, this is not something I did not want to bring to the committee. Second of all, when my colleague talks about the funding being arbitrary, our decision on this funding came from the same place that our whole committee's decision to double the funding for NSF came from. We do not know how much money we need. We know we need more, and I know with my amendment we need something. So I want to get started and the public wants to get started so that we can scientifically decide what is good and what is not good.
Lynn C. Woolsey: “First, this would have been part of the debate in the committee had I not been asked not to bring it up in committee but…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding decisions and the amendment process during a floor debate.
Share
More from Lynn C. Woolsey
We know that the smelt has its place in the ecosystem and that, yes, indeed Southern California needs water.
I believe we have complete agreement with the first principle that you have referred to today, and that is that every able-bodied person should be working or preparing to work.
Thank you, George, for doing this. Thank you for honoring those of us that have been here and now are leaving. I arrived feeling very green and feeling very good 20 years ago. I had no idea how little I knew about how to get something done…
I just want to repeat what I said in my opening remarks. Nothing in the proposed rule would have applied to children working on their parents' family farm. The proposed rule maintains the parental exemption. But again, to remind everybody…





